Ecovision Engineering delivers environmental consulting and turnkey solutions including Environmental Site Assessments (Phase I, II, and supplemental Phase II / Phase III), soil and groundwater remediation, Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA), risk assessments, permitting and compliance support, and customized engineered systems (water/wastewater, energy optimization, and integrated solutions).

A Phase I ESA is a non-intrusive historical and regulatory review used to identify potential environmental liabilities (APECs/RECs).
A Phase II ESA involves fieldwork and sampling (soil, groundwater, etc.) to confirm whether contamination is present and at what concentration, based on laboratory analysis and applicable standards.

Timelines depend on site complexity and document availability, but we prioritize speed without compromising compliance. Once we confirm the scope and property details, we provide a clear schedule and delivery date at the start of the mandate.

Yes. If unexpected contamination is encountered mid-project, we can rapidly assess conditions, guide safe handling and compliance, develop an interim plan, and pivot to a structured remediation pathway so work can resume with controlled risk.

Best-case package:

• site address + intended use/development plan

• timeline and critical milestones

• any previous reports (Phase I/II, geotech, lab data)

• known constraints (access, utilities, excavation limits)

• any lender/authority requirements
  Even if you only have partial info, we can start with a scoped approach and refine quickly.

Phase I ESA cost depends on site size, historical complexity, and how many records and interviews are required. Most projects are priced based on scope, timeline, and reporting requirements (including lender needs). Ecovision provides a clear quote after confirming the property address, current use, and transaction deadline.

A Phase II ESA timeline depends on field access, drilling and sampling scope, laboratory turnaround time, and reporting complexity. Most timelines include (1) fieldwork, (2) lab analysis, and (3) interpretation/reporting. Ecovision plans Phase II investigations to match project deadlines while keeping sampling defensible and compliant.

Phase II testing is selected based on site history and regulatory requirements, but common contaminants include petroleum hydrocarbons, VOCs, PAHs, metals, chlorinated solvents, and other site-specific chemicals of concern. Ecovision tailors the analytical program so results are meaningful for both regulatory comparison and remediation planning.

Soil remediation is the process of treating, removing, or managing contaminated soil to meet regulatory criteria or risk-based closure targets. Methods vary by site and contaminant type and can include excavation and off-site disposal, in-situ treatment (bioremediation, chemical oxidation, vapor extraction), and engineered containment approaches. Ecovision selects remediation technologies based on feasibility, compliance, schedule, and total project cost.

Yes. We produce reports and supporting documentation that are defensible and review-ready, and we can support regulator interactions, technical responses, and revisions. For projects requiring public-facing steps (EIA/EIAR processes), we help keep the process structured and credible.

Yes. If contamination is suspected or confirmed, we can provide conceptual remediation scenarios and cost ranges. If you need tighter certainty, we recommend targeted investigations to delineate impacts enough to produce a defendable budget and scope.

Groundwater remediation is used to reduce contaminant concentrations in groundwater and control plume migration. Timelines vary widely depending on hydrogeology, contaminant type, and cleanup objectives. Solutions may include groundwater treatment systems, in-situ treatment, monitored natural attenuation, or risk-based management. Ecovision develops realistic schedules and performance targets so expectations match site reality.

We control the things that usually go wrong:

• clear scope, phasing, and decision points

• contractor coordination and active field supervision

• compliance planning upfront (permits, soil traceability, disposal routes)

• documentation designed for closure, not just “a report”
  The objective is simple: keep the project moving while staying compliant.

The most common problems aren’t just contamination. They’re:

• unknown remediation scope (no delineation, no cost certainty)

• regulatory roadblocks (permits, approvals, closure criteria)

• schedule impacts (construction delays, seasonal constraints)

• soil management/traceability requirements that weren’t planned for
  We focus on turning uncertainty into a clear plan, including realistic cost and timeline scenarios.

Yes. Ecovision can manage the full remediation process from strategy and permitting to contractor coordination, field execution, soil traceability, compliance oversight, and regulatory closure reporting. One point of contact, one coordinated plan, and clear accountability.